

Why Choose Pitre & Associates?
-
Our attorneys bring over 15 years of experience in federal employment law, specializing in complex legal matters like discrimination, wrongful termination, and whistleblower protections. We are committed to staying at the forefront of legal developments to provide the most effective strategies for our clients.
-
Our attorneys have successfully negotiated over 8 million dollars in compensatory awards and attorney fees for clients. We’ve also prevented the removal and/or suspension of several federal employees, demonstrating our ability to achieve favorable outcomes. See our News and Case Successes for more details.
-
Pitre & Associates, LLC and its attorneys have maintained an impeccable record with no complaints to the DC Bar or negative reports to the Better Business Bureau. Our reputation reflects our commitment to professionalism, ethical standards, and high-quality service for every client.
-
Pitre & Associates, LLC has built a reputation for trust, earning the confidence of nearly every client we represent. Our personalized approach makes clients feel valued, and we take great pride in achieving high levels of satisfaction by focusing on their unique needs and providing exceptional service.
What Proof Do I Need in a Federal Pregnancy Discrimination Claim?
Important types of proof that can support a pregnancy discrimination claim include:
- Direct Evidence of Discrimination: Direct evidence, though rare, is the most straightforward form of proof and includes explicit statements or communications from the employer acknowledging discriminatory intent. For instance, if a supervisor directly states that a pregnant employee’s job performance or reliability is in question due to her pregnancy, it can serve as compelling evidence of discrimination.
- Comparative Evidence: Comparative evidence is used to show that a pregnant employee was treated differently than other employees with similar conditions. For example, if an employer accommodates other employees with temporary injuries but refuses similar accommodations to a pregnant employee, it may indicate discriminatory intent. Comparative evidence helps establish that the employer is selectively applying policies in a way that unfairly impacts pregnant employees.


-
5-Star Reviews
-
Recent Victories
-
Helpful Articles
